Julie C. Tizzard
Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans
Tel:
+1.504.529.3774
Toll Free:
1.877.742.7590
  • Home
  • About
  • Criminal Defense
  • Personal Injury
  • DWI / DUI
  • Sex Crimes
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact
  • Case Law Updates
Home » Blog » Case Law Update » Peugh V. United States- United States Supreme Court denies retrospective application of more severe sentencing guidelines

Peugh V. United States- United States Supreme Court denies retrospective application of more severe sentencing guidelines

Posted by admin on 24 March, 2023

Subject: Supreme Court holds Ex Post Facto Clause prohibits retrospective application of advisory guidelines

In an opinion by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court held today in Peugh v. United States, No. 12-62, that “[a] retrospective increase in the Guidelines range applicable to a defendant creates a sufficient risk of a higher sentence to constitute an ex post facto violation.” The Seventh Circuit’s precedent in United States v. Demaree, 459 F. 3d 791 (7th Cir. 2006), is reversed.

In holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause is violated when a defendant is sentenced under a more severe version of the guidelines in effect at the time of sentencing rather than the version in effect at the time of the offense, the Court points to the continuing role of the guidelines as the “initial benchmark” and “starting point” in the district court, the various procedural hurdles to a non-guideline sentence in the district court, the presumption of reasonableness of a within-guideline sentence in the court of appeals, and appellate review of a district court’s procedure. All of these “gent[le] checks” on the district court’s discretion, it says, make a guideline sentence more likely, absent a reason for a non-guideline sentence: “That a district court may ultimately sentence a given defendant outside the Guidelines range does not deprive the Guidelines of force as the framework for sentencing.”

As evidence that the “procedural measures” adopted by the federal sentencing system have the effect of “influencing the sentences imposed by judges,” the Court points to empirical data showing that, since 2007, the majority of sentences, in the aggregate, are within the guidelines or below the guidelines based on a government motion.

Dissenting opinions by Justice Thomas, joined in part by Justices Alito, C.J. Roberts, and Scalia, and by Justice Alito, joined by Justice Scalia. Opinion is here: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-62_5g68.pdf

Tags: Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Peugh v. United States, retrospective application of more severe sentencing guidelines

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Posts :

  • Justices to consider retroactivity of the Ramos decision
  • Supreme Court rules non-unanimous juries unconstitutional
  • Dallas police officer arrested for killing man in wrong apartment
  • Kamala Harris Grills Brett Kavanaugh
  • Defense begins in Manafort tax evasion and fraud trial

Categories :

  • Case Law Update
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives :

  • May 2020
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • June 2013
  • February 2013
  • July 2009
  • Home
  • About
  • Criminal Defense
  • Personal Injury
  • DWI / DUI
  • Sex Crimes
  • Blog
  • News
  • Contact
  • Case Law Updates
Copyright © 2023 criminaldefenseneworleans.com