"The court determines that plaintiffs have convincingly argued that the term 'emolument' in both the foreign and domestic Emoluments Clauses, with slight refinements that the court will address, means any 'profit,' 'gain,' or 'advantage' and that accordingly they have stated...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Attorney, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Donald Trump, Emoluments Clause, Federal Case Law Update, Federal Criminal Attorney New Orleans, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Lawyer, United States Supreme Court
Syllabus
NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Attorney, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Donald Trump, New Orleans Federal Criminal Attorney, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Lawyer, Trump v. Hawaii, United States Supreme Court
Senators considering President Donald Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court will undoubtedly be giving a close read to a law-review article the judge published in 2009, entitled “Separation of Powers During the Forty-Fourth Presidency and Beyond.” The...
Continue Reading »
In Rodriguez, the question presented, as stated in the petition, is:
This Court has held that, during an otherwise lawful traffic stop, asking a driver to exit a
vehicle, conducting a drug sniff with a trained canine, or asking a few off-topic questions are “de minimis”...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Attorney New Orleans, Cert granted in Rodriguez and Ohio v. Clark, Criminal Attorney, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Federal Case Law Update, Federal Criminal Attorney New Orleans, New Orleans Criminal Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Attorney, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Lawyer, United States Supreme Court
The Court granted cert in Mellouli v. Holder (No. 13-1034) to decide the following question: Whether, to trigger deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), which provides that a noncitizen may be removed if he has been convicted of violating “any law or regulation of a State, the...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Attorney New Orleans, Case Law Update, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Drug Paraphernalia and Deportation, Federal Case Law Update, Federal Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Mellouli v. Holder, New Orleans Federal Criminal Attorney, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Lawyer, United States Supreme Court
The Supreme Court issued a unanimous, consolidated opinion in Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie (Nos. 13-132, 13-212), declining to extend the search incident to arrest exception in United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973) “to searches of data on cell phones, and...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Federal Case Law Update, Federal Criminal Attorney New Orleans, New Orleans Crime News, New Orleans Criminal Attorney, New Orleans Federal Criminal Attorney, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, New Orleans Federal Criminal Lawyer, Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie, United States Supreme Court, Warrant required for cell phone searches
The Supreme Court decided Abramski v. United States (No.12-1493) and granted certiorari in Elonis v. United States (No. 13-983).
In Abramski, the Court held that a straw purchaser can be convicted under 18 U. S. C. §922(a)(6) for making false statements about “any fact material to the...
Continue Reading »
Tags: Abramski v. United States, Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Attorney New Orleans, Criminal Defense Lawyer New Orleans, Criminal Lawyer New Orleans, Elonis v. United States, Federal Case Law Update, Federal Criminal Attorney New Orleans, New Orleans Federal Criminal Defense Lawyer, Straw purchaser firearm, United States Supreme Court
